Name

Age

Director Since

Principal Occupation

Independent

Audit and Risk Committee

Compensation Committee

Nominating  and Corporate  Governance Committee

Lloyd A. Carney

53

2015

Chief Executive Officer, Brocade Communications

Yes

Mary B. Cranston

67

2007

Retired Senior Partner, Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP

Yes

C

Francisco Javier Fernández–Carbajal

60

2007

Consultant and Former Chief Executive Officer, Corporate Development Division of Grupo Financiero BBVA Bancomer, S.A.

Yes

Alfred F. Kelly, Jr.

57

2014

Management Advisor, TowerBrook Capital Partners L.P. and Former President, American Express Company

Yes

C

Robert W. Matschullat*

68

2007

Former Vice Chairman and Chief Financial Officer, The Seagram Company Limited

Yes

EO

EO

EO

Cathy E. Minehan

68

2007

Dean of the School of Management, Simmons College and former President and CEO, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston

Yes

Suzanne Nora Johnson

58

2007

Former Vice Chairman, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.

Yes

C

David J. Pang

72

2007

Chief Executive Officer, Kerry Group Kuok Foundation Limited

Yes

Charles W. Scharf

50

2012

Chief Executive Officer, Visa Inc.

No

John A. C. Swainson

61

2007

President, Software Group, Dell Inc.

Yes

Maynard G. Webb, Jr.

60

2014

Founder, Webb Investment Network and Co-Founder, Everwise Corporation

Yes

 

10 - Visa Inc.2015 Proxy Statement

---

Name

Age

Director Since

Principal Occupation

Independent

Audit Committee

Compensation Committee

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

Mary B. Cranston

66

2007

Retired Senior Partner, Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP

Yes

C

Francisco Javier Fernández–Carbajal

59

2007

Consultant and Former Chief Executive Officer, Corporate Development Division of Grupo Financiero BBVA Bancomer, S.A.

Yes

Alfred F. Kelly, Jr.

56

2014

Former President, American Express Company and former President and Chief Executive Officer, 2014 NY/NJ Super Bowl Host Company

Yes

Robert W. Matschullat*

67

2007

Former Vice Chairman and Chief Financial Officer, The Seagram Company Limited

Yes

EO

EO

EO

Cathy E. Minehan

67

2007

Dean of the School of Management, Simmons College and former President and CEO, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston

Yes

Suzanne Nora Johnson

57

2007

Former Vice Chairman, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.

Yes

C

David J. Pang

71

2007

Chief Executive Officer, Kerry Group Kuok Foundation Limited

Yes

Charles W. Scharf

49

2012

Chief Executive Officer, Visa Inc.

No

William S. Shanahan

74

2007

Former President, Colgate-Palmolive Company

Yes

C

John A. C. Swainson

60

2007

President, Software Group, Dell Inc.

Yes

Maynard G. Webb, Jr.

59

2014

Founder, Webb Investment Network andCo-Founder, Everwise Corporation

Yes

* = Independent Chair of the board		= Member		C = Chair		EO =Ex Officio committee meeting attendee

As the independent Chair of the board, Mr. Matschullat has a standing invitation to attend meetings of the board’s committees. However, he is not a committee member, is not counted for purposes of determining a quorum at committee meetings, and does not vote on committee matters.

 

As the independent Chair of the board, Mr. Matschullat has a standing invitation to attend meetings of the board’s committees. However, he is not a committee member, is not counted for purposes of determining a quorum at committee meetings, and does not vote on committee matters.

Visa Inc.2015 Proxy Statement - 11

12 - Visa Inc.2015 Proxy Statement

Visa Inc.2015 Proxy Statement - 13

PROXY STATEMENT

FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

January 28, 2015

We are providing you with these proxy materials in connection with the solicitation by the board of directors of Visa Inc. of proxies to be used at our 2015 Annual Meeting of stockholders. This proxy statement contains important information regarding the Annual Meeting, the proposals on which you are being asked to vote, information you may find useful in determining how to vote, and information about voting procedures. As used herein, “we,” “us,” “our,” “Visa” or the “Company” refers to Visa Inc., a Delaware corporation.

A Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, this proxy statement, any accompanying proxy card or voting instruction form, and our fiscal year 2014 Annual Report to stockholders will be made available to our stockholders on or about December 12, 2014.

When and where will the meeting take place?

The 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders will take place at the Crowne Plaza Hotel, 1221 Chess Drive, Foster City, CA 94404 on January 28, 2015 at 8:30 a.m. Pacific Time.

What matters will be voted on at the Annual Meeting?

The following matters will be voted on at the Annual Meeting:

14 - Visa Inc.2015 Proxy Statement

We do not expect any other items of business to be brought before the Annual Meeting because the deadlines for stockholder proposals and director nominations have already passed. Nonetheless, in case there is an unforeseen need, your proxy gives discretionary authority to the persons named on the proxy card to vote your shares with respect to any other matters that might be brought before the meeting. Those persons intend to vote the proxy in accordance with their best judgment.

Who may vote at the Annual Meeting?

Holders of our Class A common stock at the close of business on December 1, 2014, or the Record Date, may vote on all proposals at the Annual Meeting. Each Class A stockholder is entitled to one vote for each share of Class A common stock held as of the Record Date.

Holders of our Class B and Class C common stock at the close of business on the Record Date, may vote on proposals 2 and 5(a)-(c) at the Annual Meeting. Holders of our Class A, Class B and Class C common stock will each vote as a separate class on proposals 2 and 5(c), with each stockholder entitled to one vote for each share of stock held at the close of business on the Record Date. Holders of our Class A, Class B and Class C common stock will vote together as a single class on proposals 5(a) and 5(b), with Class B and Class C shares voting on an as-converted basis, which means that the holders of shares of Class B common stock or Class C common stock will be entitled, with respect to each share of Class B common stock or Class C common stock, as applicable, held at the close of business on the Record Date, to a number of votes equal to the aggregate number of shares of Class A common stock into which each share of Class B common stock or Class C common stock owned by such holder would be convertible at the close of business on the Record Date.

Stockholders at the close of business on the Record Date may examine a list of all stockholders as of the Record Date for any purpose germane to the Annual Meeting for ten days preceding the Annual Meeting, at our offices in Foster City, California or at the Annual Meeting. If you would like to view the stockholder list, please call our Investor Relations Department at (650) 432-7644 to schedule an appointment.

How does the board of directors recommend that I vote?

The board of directors recommends that you vote:

What is the difference between holding shares as a stockholder of record and as a beneficial owner?

Stockholders of Record.  You are a stockholder of record if, at the close of business on the Record Date, your shares were registered directly in your name with Wells Fargo Shareowner Services, our transfer agent. All Class B and Class C holders are stockholders of record.

Beneficial Owner.  You are a beneficial owner if, at the close of business on the Record Date, your Class A shares were held by a brokerage firm or other nominee and not in your name. Being a beneficial owner means that, like most of our Class A stockholders, your shares are held in “street name.” As the beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your broker or nominee how to vote your shares by following the voting instructions your broker or other nominee provides. If you do not provide your broker or nominee with instructions on how to vote your shares, your broker or nominee will be able to vote your shares with respect to some of the proposals in this proxy statement, but not all. Please see the headingWhat if I submit a proxy or voting instructions, but do not specify how my shares are to be voted? for additional information.

Visa Inc.2015 Proxy Statement - 15

What do I need to do to attend the Annual Meeting in person?

If you are a holder of our Class A, Class B or Class C common stock as of the close of business on the Record Date and you plan to attend the Annual Meeting in person, you must contact our Investor Relations Department at (650) 432-7644 by January 23, 2015 to reserve a seat at the Annual Meeting. All holders of our common stock who plan to attend the Annual Meeting will be required to provide proof of their stock ownership as of the Record Date, such as an account or brokerage statement showing such ownership as of the close of business on the Record Date. In order to vote at the Annual Meeting, Class A holders who are the beneficial owner of their shares also must bring a legal proxy from the organization that holds their shares. Representatives of institutional stockholders must bring a legal proxy or other proof that they are representatives of a firm that held shares as of the close of business on the Record Date and are authorized to vote on behalf of the firm.

Anyone seeking admittance to the Annual Meeting who cannot prove ownership or representation as of the close of business on the Record Date, or who has not reserved a seat in advance, may not be admitted. In addition, stockholders must also bring a form of government-issued photo identification, such as a driver’s license, state-issued identification card, or passport to gain entry to the Annual Meeting.

When you arrive, signs will direct you to the meeting room. Due to security measures, all bags will be subject to search, and all persons who attend the Annual Meeting may be subject to a metal detector and/or a hand wand search. We will be unable to admit anyone who does not comply with these security procedures. We will not permit the use of cameras (including cell phones with photographic or video capabilities) and other recording devices in the meeting room. If you need assistance at the meeting because of a disability, please call our Investor Relations Department at (650) 432-7644, at least two weeks in advance of the meeting.

Please visit the Investor Relations page of our website athttp://investor.visa.com for directions to the Crowne Plaza Hotel, 1221 Chess Drive, Foster City, CA 94404.

If I am unable to attend the Annual Meeting in person, can I listen to the meeting via webcast?

Yes. An audio webcast of the Annual Meeting will be available on the Investor Relations page of our website athttp://investor.visa.com at 8:30 a.m. Pacific Time on January 28, 2015. Although stockholders accessing the Annual Meeting via the webcast will be able to listen to the meeting, they will not be considered present at the Annual Meeting and will not be able to vote through the webcast or ask questions. An archived copy of the webcast will be available on our website through February 27, 2015. Registration to listen to the webcast will be required.

Why did I receive a notice in the mail regarding the Internet availability of proxy materials instead of a full set of printed proxy materials?

Pursuant to rules adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC, we are making this proxy statement available to our Class A stockholders electronically via the Internet. On or about December 12, 2014, we will mail the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials to stockholders of our Class A common stock at the close of business on the Record Date, other than those Class A stockholders who previously requested electronic or paper delivery of communications from us. The Notice contains instructions on how to access an electronic copy of our proxy materials, including this proxy statement and our fiscal year 2014 Annual Report. The Notice also contains instructions on how to request a paper copy of the proxy statement. We believe that this process will allow us to provide you with the information you need in a timely manner, while conserving natural resources and lowering the costs of printing and distributing our proxy materials. Our Class B and Class C stockholders will receive paper copies of the proxy materials.

Can I vote my Class A shares by filling out and returning the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials?

No. The Notice only identifies the items to be voted on at the Annual Meeting. You cannot vote by marking the Notice and returning it. The Notice provides instructions on how to obtain the full set of proxy materials and cast your vote. For additional information, please see the answer to the next question.

16 - Visa Inc.2015 Proxy Statement

How do I vote my shares and what are the voting deadlines?

Stockholders of Record.  If you are a stockholder of record, including Class B and Class C stockholders, there are several ways for you to vote your shares:

Beneficial Owners.  If you are a beneficial owner of Class A shares, you should receive a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials or voting instructions from the broker or other nominee holding your shares. You should follow the instructions in the Notice or the voting instructions provided by your broker or nominee in order to instruct your broker or nominee on how to vote your shares. The availability of telephone and Internet voting will depend on the voting process of the broker or nominee. Shares held beneficially may be voted in person at the Annual Meeting only if you obtain a legal proxy from the broker or nominee giving you the right to vote the shares.

Can I revoke or change my vote after I submit my proxy?

Stockholders of Record.  If you are a stockholder of record, including holders of Class B and Class C shares, you may revoke your vote before the completion of voting at the Annual Meeting by:

Beneficial Owners.  If you are a beneficial owner of Class A shares, you must follow the instructions provided by the broker or other nominee holding your shares for changing your vote.

What will happen if I do not vote my shares?

Stockholders of Record.  If you are the stockholder of record of your shares and you do not vote by proxy card, by telephone, via the Internet or in person at the Annual Meeting, your shares will not be voted at the Annual Meeting.

Beneficial Owners.  If you are the beneficial owner of your Class A shares and you do not instruct your broker or other nominee how to vote your shares, your broker or nominee may exercise its discretion to vote on some proposals at the Annual Meeting, but not all. Under the rules of the New York Stock Exchange, or the NYSE, your broker or nominee does not have discretion to vote your shares on non-routine matters such as proposals 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5(a)-(e). However, your broker or nominee does have discretion to vote your shares on routine matters such as proposal 6.

Visa Inc.2015 Proxy Statement - 17

What if I submit a proxy or voting instructions, but do not specify how my shares are to be voted?

Stockholders of Record.  If you are a Class A, Class B or Class C stockholder of record and you submit a proxy card, but you do not provide voting instructions on the card, your shares will be voted:

Beneficial Owners.  If you are a beneficial owner of Class A shares and you do not provide the broker or other nominee that holds your shares with voting instructions, the broker or nominee will determine if it has the discretionary authority to vote on your behalf. Under the NYSE’s rules, brokers and nominees have the discretion to vote on routine matters such as proposal 6, but do not have discretion to vote on non-routine matters such as proposals 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5(a)-(e). Therefore, if you do not provide voting instructions to your broker or nominee, your broker or nominee may only vote your shares on proposal 6 and any other routine matters properly presented for a vote at the Annual Meeting.

What is the effect of a broker non-vote?

Brokers or other nominees who hold shares of our Class A common stock for a beneficial owner have the discretion to vote on routine proposals when they have not received voting instructions from the beneficial owner at least ten days prior to the Annual Meeting. A broker non-vote occurs when a broker or other nominee does not receive voting instructions from the beneficial owner and does not have the discretion to direct the voting of the shares.

Broker non-votes will be counted for purposes of calculating whether a quorum is present at the Annual Meeting with respect to all of the proposals to be considered at the Annual Meeting. They also will be counted for purposes of determining the number of votes present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote with respect to proposals 2 and 5(a)-(e). However, broker non-votes will not be counted for purposes of determining the number of votes present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote with respect to proposals 1, 3, 4 and 6.

How many shares must be present in person or represented by proxy to conduct business at the Annual Meeting?

We need a quorum with respect to each proposal being submitted for stockholder vote. A quorum exists for purposes of proposals 1, 3, 4, 5(d)-(e) and 6 when holders of at least a majority of the outstanding shares of Class A common stock are represented at the Annual Meeting either in person or by proxy. A quorum exists for purposes of proposals 2 and5(a)-(c) when holders of at least a majority of the outstanding shares of each of the Class A common stock, Class B common stock and Class C common stock are represented at the Annual Meeting either in person or by proxy. As of the close of business on the Record Date, we had 493,492,938 shares of Class A common stock, 245,513,385 shares of Class B common stock, and 23,858,022 shares of Class C common stock outstanding, meaning that, for purposes of proposals 1, 3, 4, 5(d)-(e) and 6, holders of at least 246,746,470 shares of Class A common stock must be represented at the Annual Meeting in person or by proxy to have a quorum and, for purposes of proposals 2 and 5(a)-(c), holders of at least 246,746,470 shares of Class A common stock, 122,756,693 shares of Class B common stock and 11,929,012 shares of Class C common stock must be represented at the Annual Meeting in person or by proxy to have a quorum.

Your shares will be counted towards the quorum if you submit your vote by mail, by telephone, or via the Internet or if you vote in person at the Annual Meeting. Abstentions and broker non-votes also will count towards the quorum requirement. If a quorum is not met, holders of a majority of the shares of Class A common stock present at the Annual Meeting may adjourn the meeting to a later date.

18 - Visa Inc.2015 Proxy Statement

What vote is required to approve each proposal?

With respect to all proposals, you may vote FOR, AGAINST or ABSTAIN. Brokers or other nominees who do not receive voting instructions from the beneficial owners of Class A shares will only have discretion to vote on proposal 6. The vote required to approve each proposal is set forth below.

Visa Inc.2015 Proxy Statement - 19

What happens if a director nominee does not receive a majority of the votes cast for his or her re-election?

Our Corporate Governance Guidelines require each incumbent director nominee to submit an irrevocable contingent resignation letter prior to the mailing of the proxy statement for an annual meeting at which the nominee’s candidacy will be considered. If the nominee does not receive a majority of the votes cast for his or her re-election, meaning that he or she does not have more votes cast FOR than AGAINST his or her re-election, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will recommend to the board of directors that it accept the nominee’s contingent resignation, unless the Committee determines that acceptance of the resignation would not be in the best interest of the Company and its stockholders. The board will decide whether to accept or reject the contingent resignation at its next regularly scheduled meeting, but in no event later than 120 days following certification of the election results. The board’s decision and its reasons will be promptly disclosed in a periodic or current report filed with the SEC.

Who will count the votes?

Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. has been engaged as our independent agent to receive and tabulate stockholder votes. Broadridge will separately tabulate FOR, AGAINST and ABSTAIN votes, and broker non-votes.

We also have retained an independent inspector of election, who will certify the election results and perform any other acts required by the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.

What happens if the Annual Meeting is adjourned or postponed?

Your proxy will still be effective and will be voted at the rescheduled or adjourned Annual Meeting. You will still be able to change or revoke your proxy until the rescheduled or adjourned Annual Meeting.

Who is paying for the costs of this proxy solicitation?

We will bear the expense of soliciting proxies. We have retained D. F. King & Co. to solicit proxies for a fee of $11,000 plus a reasonable amount to cover expenses. Proxies may also be solicited in person, by telephone or electronically by Visa personnel who will not receive additional compensation for such solicitation. Copies of proxy materials and the fiscal year 2014 Annual Report will be supplied to brokers and other nominees for the purpose of soliciting proxies from beneficial owners, and we will reimburse such brokers or other nominees for their reasonable expenses.

How can I find the results of the Annual Meeting?

Preliminary results will be announced at the Annual Meeting. Final results also will be published in a current report on Form 8-K to be filed with the SEC within four business days after the Annual Meeting. If the official results are not available at that time, we will provide preliminary voting results in the Form 8-K and will provide the final results in an amendment to the Form 8-K as soon as they become available.

20 - Visa Inc.2015 Proxy Statement

Our board of directors is responsible for overseeingoversees the business of the Company in order to serve the long-term interests of our stockholders. Members of our board are kept informed of our business through discussions with our Chief Executive Officer, President, Chief Financial Officer, General Counsel, Chief Risk Officer and other officers and employees, and by reviewing materials provided to them and participating in regular meetings of the board and its committees.

The board of directors regularly monitors our corporate governance policies and profile to ensure we meet or exceed the requirements of applicable laws, regulations and rules, and the NYSE’s listing standards. We have instituted a variety of practices to foster and maintain responsible corporate governance, which are described in this section. To learn more about Visa’s corporate governance and to view our Corporate Governance Guidelines, Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers, and the charters of each of the board’s committees, please visit the Investor Relations page of our website athttp://investor.visa.com under “Corporate Governance.” Copies of these documents also are available in print free of charge by writing to our Corporate Secretary at Visa Inc., P.O. Box 8999, San Francisco,CA 94128-8999.

Highlights of our Corporate Governance

Visa Inc.2015 Proxy Statement - 21

Corporate Governance Guidelines

Our board of directors has adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines, which guide the operation of the board and its committees. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee reviews the Corporate Governance Guidelines at least annually and recommends any changes to the board for its consideration and approval.

The Corporate Governance Guidelines cover, among other topics:

Please see the section entitledAvailability of Corporate Governance Documents for information on how to view or obtain a copy of our Corporate Governance Guidelines.

22 - Visa Inc.2015 Proxy Statement

Limitation on Other Board and Audit Committee Service

Our Corporate Governance Guidelines include a policy that our directors will not serve as a member of the board of directors of more than five publicly-traded companies (including the Company’s board). Additionally, board members who are chief executive officers of publicly-traded companies are limited to service on no more than two publicly-traded companies in addition to their own (including the Company’s board), and board members who serve on the Audit and Risk Committee are limited to service on the audit committee of no more than three publicly-traded companies (including the Company). Exceptions to these limits may be granted by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee on a case-by-case basis after taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the exception request. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the board determined that these limits are appropriate after assessing the time commitments and other demands associated with effectively serving as a member of the Company’s board and Audit and Risk Committee.

The Guidelines provide that prior to accepting an invitation to serve on the board or audit committee of another publicly-traded company, a director should advise the Chair of the board and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of the invitation so that the board, through the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, has the opportunity to review the director’s ability to continue to fulfill his or her responsibilities as a member of the Company’s board or Audit and Risk Committee. When reviewing such a request, the Committee may consider a number of factors, including the director’s other time commitments, record of attendance at board and committee meetings, potential conflicts of interest and other legal considerations, and the impact of the proposed directorship or audit committee service on the director’s availability.

Board Leadership Structure

Following the retirement of our Executive Chair in April 2013, the board of directors separated the roles of the Chair and Chief Executive Officer. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the board believe that this leadership structurehaving the Chair and Chief Executive Officer in separate roles is the most appropriate oneleadership structure for the Company at this time, by allowing our Chief Executive Officer, Charles W. Scharf, to focus on the day-to-day management of the business and on executing our strategic priorities, while allowing our independent Chair, Robert W. Matschullat, to focus on

leading the board, providing advice and counsel to Mr. Scharf and facilitating the board’s independent oversight of management. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will continue to periodically review the board’s leadership structure and to exercise its discretion in recommending an appropriate and effective framework on a case-by-case basis, taking into consideration the needs of the board and the Company at such time.

As our independent Chair, Mr. Matschullat’s duties and responsibilities include: presiding at meetings of the board and calling, setting the agenda for and chairing periodic executive sessions of the independent directors; providing feedback to the Chief Executive Officer on corporate policies and strategies; acting as a liaison between the board and the Chief Executive Officer; and facilitating one-on-one communication between directors, committee chairs, the Chief Executive Officer and other senior managers to keep abreast of their perspectives.

In addition to our independent Chair, the board has three standing committees: the Audit and Risk Committee, chaired by Mary B. Cranston; the Compensation Committee, chaired by William S. Shanahan;Suzanne Nora Johnson; and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, chaired by Suzanne Nora Johnson.Alfred F. Kelly. In their capacities as independent committee chairs, Ms. Cranston, Mr. Shanahan, and Ms. Nora Johnson and Mr. Kelly each have responsibilities that contribute to the board’s oversight of management and facilitate communication among the board and the Chief Executive Officer.

Independence of Directors

The rolesNYSE’s listing standards and responsibilities of the committee chairs and their committees are set forth in the committee charters and in our Corporate Governance Guidelines which are available onprovide that a majority of our websiteboard of directors and every member of the Audit and Risk, Compensation and Nominating and Corporate Governance committees must be “independent.” Our Certificate of Incorporation further requires that athttp://investor.visa.com under “Corporate least fifty-eight percent (58%) of our board be independent. Under the NYSE’s listing standards, our Corporate Governance” Guidelines and are more fully describedour Certificate of Incorporation, no director will be considered to be independent unless our board affirmatively determines that such director has no direct or indirect material relationship with Visa or our management. Our board reviews the independence of its members annually and has adopted guidelines to assist it in making its independence determinations.

In October 2015, with the assistance of legal counsel, our board conducted its annual review of director independence and affirmatively determined that each of our non-employee directors (Lloyd A. Carney, Mary B. Cranston, Francisco Javier Fernández-Carbajal, Alfred F. Kelly, Jr., Suzanne Nora Johnson, Robert W. Matschullat, Cathy E. Minehan, David J. Pang, William S. Shanahan, John A. C. Swainson and Maynard G. Webb, Jr.) is “independent” as that term is defined in the section entitledBoard MeetingsNYSE’s listing standards, our independence guidelines and Committeesour Certificate of Incorporation.

In making the determination that the directors listed above are independent, the board considered relevant transactions, relationships and arrangements, including those specified in the NYSE listing standards and our independence guidelines, and determined that these relationships were not material relationships that would impair the director’s independence. In this regard, the board considered that certain directors serve as directors of other companies with which the Company engages in ordinary-course-of-business transactions, and that, in accordance with our director independence guidelines, none of these relationships constitute material relationships that would impair the independence of these individuals. Discretionary contributions to certain charitable organizations with which some of our directors are affiliated also were considered, and the board determined that the amounts contributed to each of these charitable organizations in any fiscal year were less than the greater of one million dollars or two percent of the Boardorganization’s consolidated gross revenues.

The board also considered, for Ms. Cranston (i) her daughter’s relationship with one of our former employees, Russell Hamilton (who was not an executive officer), as discussed under the headingCertain Relationships and Related Person Transactions., and (ii) services provided to the Company by a law firm of which she is a retired senior partner, including that, pursuant to her retirement (which predated our engagement of the law firm), she receives no compensation from the firm, has no capital in the firm, and is no longer a signatory to the firm’s

partnership agreement. For Messrs. Carney, Fernández-Carbajal, Kelly, Swainson, Webb, and Ms. Minehan, the board considered the amounts paid or received by the Company pursuant to ordinary-course-of-business transactions with other entities (which, in any single fiscal year, did not equal or exceed the greater of one million dollars or two percent of the annual consolidated revenues of the other entity), where the director or the director’s immediate family member is or was an employee or officer of such entity, or had a direct or indirect ownership interest in such entity.

Majority Vote Standard for Directors

Our Corporate Governance Guidelines require each incumbent director nominee to submit an irrevocable contingent resignation letter prior to the mailing of the proxy statement for an annual meeting at which the nominee’s candidacy will be considered. If the nominee does not receive a majority of the votes cast for his or her re-election, meaning that he or she does not have more votes cast FOR than AGAINST his or her re-election, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will recommend to the board of directors that it accept the nominee’s contingent resignation, unless the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee determines that acceptance of the resignation would not be in the best interest of the Company and its stockholders. The board will decide whether to accept or reject the contingent resignation at its next regularly scheduled meeting, but in no event later than 120 days following certification of the election results. The board’s decision and its reasons will be promptly disclosed in a periodic or current report filed with the SEC.

The Board of Directors’ Role in Risk Oversight

Our board of directors recognizes the importance of effective risk oversight in running a successful business and in fulfilling its fiduciary responsibilities to Visa and its stockholders. While the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Risk Officer and other members of our senior leadership team are responsible for the day-to-day management of risk, our board of directors is responsible for ensuring that an appropriate culture of risk management exists within the Company and for setting the right “tone at the top,” overseeing our aggregate risk profile and monitoring how the Company addresses specific risks, such as strategic and competitive risks, financial risks, brand and reputation risks, legal risks, regulatory risks and operational risks.

Visa Inc.2015 Proxy Statement - 23

The board believes that its current leadership structure facilitates its oversight of risk by combining independent leadership, through the independent Chair of the board, independent board committees and majority independent board composition, with an experienced Chief Executive Officer who is a member of the board. Mr. Scharf’s industry experience and day-to-day management of the Company as our Chief Executive Officer enable him to identify and raise key business risks to the board and focus the board’s attention on areas of concern. The independent Chair, independent committee chairs and the other directors also are experienced professionals or executives, who are very knowledgeable about the Company and who can and do raise issues for board consideration and review. The board believes there is a well-functioning and effective balance between the independent Chair, non-employee board members, the Chief Executive Officer and other members of management, which enhances the board’s risk oversight.

The board of directors exercises its oversight responsibility for risk both directly and through its three standing committees. Throughout the year, the board and each committee spend a portion of their time reviewing and discussing specific risk topics. The full board is kept informed of each committee’s risk oversight and related activities through regular oral reports from the committee chairs, and committee meeting minutes are available for review by all directors. On an annual basis, the Chief Risk Officer and other members of senior management report on our top risks and the steps management has taken or will take to mitigate these risks. In addition, at each quarterly meeting the General Counsel updates the board on material legal and regulatory matters,risks and the board is provided with and discusses a written Enterprise Risk Management, or ERM, update twiceand information security update annually. In addition, the General Counsel updates the board regularly on material legal and regulatory matters. Written reports also are provided to and discussed by the board regularly regarding recent business, legal, regulatory, competitive and other developments impacting the Company.

The Audit and Risk Committee is responsible for reviewing our ERM framework and programs, as well as the framework by which management discusses our risk profile and risk exposures with the full board and its committees. The Audit and Risk Committee meets regularly with our Chief Financial Officer, General Counsel, Chief Risk Officer, Chief Auditor, Chief Compliance Officer, independent auditor and other members of senior management to discuss our major financial risk exposures, financial reporting, internal controls, credit and liquidity risks, legal and compliance risks, key operational risks, cybersecurity and information security risks and controls and the ERM framework and programs. Other responsibilities include reviewing at least annually reviewing the overall implementation and effectiveness of our compliance and ethics program and our business continuity plan and test results. The Audit and Risk Committee also meets regularly in separate executive session with the Chief Financial Officer, General Counsel, Chief Risk Officer, Chief Auditor and independent auditor, as well as with committee members only, to facilitate a full and candid discussion of risk and other issues.

The Compensation Committee is responsible for overseeing human capital and compensation risks, including evaluating and assessing risks arising from our compensation policies and practices for all employees and ensuring executive compensation is aligned with performance. The Compensation Committee is also is charged with monitoring our incentive and equity-based compensation plans, including employee pension and benefit plans. For additional information regarding the Compensation Committee’s review of compensation-related risk, please see the section entitledRisk Assessment of Compensation Programs.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee oversees risks related to our overall corporate governance, including board and committee composition, board size and structure, director independence, our corporate governance profile and ratings, and our political participation and contributions. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is also is actively engaged in overseeing risks associated with succession planning for the board and management.

Executive Sessions of the Board of Directors

The non-employee, independent members of our board of directors and all committees of the board generally meet in executive session without management present during their regularly scheduled in-person board and committee meetings, and on an as-needed basis during telephonic and special meetings. Robert W. Matschullat, our independent Chair, presides over executive sessions of the board of directors and the committee chairs, each of whom is independent, preside over executive sessions of the committees.

Codes of Conduct and Ethics

Our board of directors has adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, which applies to all directors, officers, employees and contingent staff of the Company. Additionally, the board of directors has adopted a supplemental Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers, which applies to our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Controller, General Counsel and other senior financial officers, whom we refer to collectively as senior officers. These Codes require the senior officers to engage in honest and ethical conduct in performing their duties, provide guidelines for the ethical handling of actual or apparent conflicts of interest between personal and professional relationships, and provide mechanisms to report unethical conduct. Our senior officers are held accountable for their adherence to the Codes. If we amend or grant any waiver from a provision of our Codes, we will publicly disclose such amendment or waiver in accordance with and if required by applicable law, including by posting such amendment or waiver on our website at the address above or by filing a current report on Form 8-K with the SEC.

Stockholder Engagement

Our board of directors and management team value the opinions and feedback of our stockholders, and we engage with stockholders throughout the year. Some of the major themes discussed in fiscal year 2015 included board composition and diversity, executive compensation philosophy and performance metrics, our multiclass

capital structure, proxy access, risk oversight and corporate social responsibility. Stockholders and other interested parties who wish to communicate with us on these or other matters may contact our Corporate Secretary electronically atcorporatesecretary@visa.com or by mail at Visa Inc., P.O. Box 8999, San Francisco, CA 94128-8999.

Communication with the Board of Directors

Our board of directors has adopted a process by which stockholders or other interested persons may communicate with the board or any of its members. Stockholders and other interested parties may send communications in writing to any or all directors (including the Chair or the non-employee directors as a group) electronically toboard@visa.com or by mail c/o our Corporate Secretary, Visa Inc., P.O. Box 8999, San Francisco, CA 94128-8999. Communications that meet the procedural and substantive requirements of the process approved by the board of directors will be delivered to the specified member of the board of directors, non-employee directors as a group or all members of the board of directors, as applicable, on a periodic basis, which generally will be in advance of or at each regularly scheduled meeting of the board of directors. Communications of a more urgent nature will be referred to the General Counsel, who will determine whether it should be delivered more promptly. Additional information regarding the procedural and substantive requirements for communicating with our board of directors may be found on our website athttp://investor.visa.com, under “Corporate Governance – Contact the Board.”

All communications involving accounting, internal accounting controls, and auditing matters, possible violations of, or non-compliance with, applicable legal and regulatory requirements or the Codes, or retaliatory acts against anyone who makes such a complaint or assists in the investigation of such a complaint, may be made via email tobusinessconduct@visa.com, through our Confidential Compliance Hotline at (888) 289-9322 within the United States or the AT&T International Toll-Free Dial codes available online athttp://www.usa.att.com/traveler/access numbers/index.jsp outside of the United States, through our Confidential Online Compliance Hotline athttps://visa.alertline.com, or by mail to Visa Inc., Business Conduct Office, P.O. Box 8999, San Francisco, CA 94128-8999. All such communications will be handled in accordance with our Whistleblower Policy, a copy of which may be obtained by contacting our Corporate Secretary.

Attendance at Board, Committee and Annual Stockholder Meetings

Our board of directors and its committees meet throughout the year on a set schedule, hold special meetings as needed, and act by written consent from time to time. The board of directors met 12 times during fiscal year 2015. Each director attended at least 75% or more of the aggregate of: (i) the total number of meetings of the board and independent directors held during the period in fiscal year 2015 for which he or she served as a director, and (ii) the total number of meetings held by all committees of the board on which such director served during the period in fiscal year 2015 for which he or she served as a committee member. The total number of meetings held by each committee is set forth below, under the headingCommittees of the Board of Directors. It is our policy that all members of the board should endeavor to attend annual meetings of stockholders at which directors are elected. Each of our directors serving at the time attended the 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

The current standing committees of the board of directors are the Audit and Risk Committee, the Compensation Committee, and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Each of the standing committees operates pursuant to a written charter, which is available on the Investor Relations page of our website athttp://investor.visa.com under “Corporate Governance – Committee Composition.”

Certain Relationships and Related Person Transactions

The Audit and Risk Committee has adopted a written Statement of Policy with Respect to Related Party Transactions, governing any transaction, arrangement or relationship between the Company and any related party where the aggregate amount involved will or may be expected to exceed $120,000 and any related party had, has or will have a direct or indirect material interest. Under the Policy, the Audit and Risk Committee or its management delegate shall review related party transactions and may approve or ratify them only if it is

determined that they are in, or not inconsistent with, the best interests of the Company and its stockholders. When reviewing a related party transaction, the Audit and Risk Committee or management delegate may take into consideration all of the relevant facts and circumstances available to it, including: (i) the material terms and conditions of the transaction or transactions; (ii) the related party’s relationship to Visa; (iii) the related party’s interest in the transaction, including their position or relationship with, or ownership of, any entity that is a party to or has an interest in the transaction; (iv) the approximate dollar value of the transaction; (v) the availability from other sources of comparable products or services; and (vi) an assessment of whether the transaction is on terms that are comparable to the terms available to us from an unrelated third party. Related party transactions that are approved or ratified by the management delegate must be reported to the Audit and Risk Committee at its next regularly scheduled meeting.

In the event we become aware of a related party transaction that was not previously approved or ratified under the Policy, the Audit and Risk Committee or management delegate shall evaluate all options available, including ratification, revision or termination of the related party transaction. The Policy is intended to augment and work in conjunction with our other policies that include code of conduct or conflict of interest provisions, including our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers.

We engage in transactions, arrangements and relationships with many other entities, including financial institutions and professional organizations, in the ordinary course of our business. Some of our directors, executive officers, greater than five percent stockholders and their immediate family members, each a related party under the Policy, may be directors, officers, partners, employees or stockholders of these entities. We carry out transactions with these entities on customary terms, and, in many instances, our directors and executive officers may not be aware of them. To our knowledge, since the beginning of fiscal year 2015, no Related Party has had a material interest in any of our business transactions or relationships other than as described below:

The Committee also has received the written disclosures and the letter from KPMG required by the applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding the independent registered public accounting firm’s communications with the audit committee concerning independence, and the Committee has discussed the independence of KPMG with that firm. The Committee also has considered whether KPMG’s provision of non-audit services to the Company impairs the auditor’s independence, and concluded that KPMG is independent from the Committee and the Company’s management. Based on the Committee’s review and discussions noted above, the Committee recommended to the board of directors that the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2015, for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Audit and Risk Committee of the Board of Directors Mary B. Cranston (Chair) Lloyd A. Carney Francisco Javier Fernández-Carbajal Cathy E. Minehan William S. Shanahan Maynard G. Webb, Jr.

Compensation Committee
Committee members:   Suzanne Nora Johnson, Chair   Alfred F. Kelly, Jr.   David J. Pang   John A. C. Swainson   Number of meetings in fiscal year   2015: 8		Key Activities in 2015
		•		Reviewed the overall executive compensation philosophy for the Company;
		•		Reviewed and approved corporate goals and objectives relevant to our Chief Executive Officer’s and other named executive officers’ compensation, including annual performance objectives;
		•		Evaluated the performance of our Chief Executive Officer and other named executive officers in light of the corporate goals and objectives and, based on such evaluation, determined, approved and reported to the board the annual compensation of our Chief Executive Officer and other named executive officers, including salary, bonus, stock options and other benefits;
		•		Reviewed and approved the compensation package or our newly hired named executive officer;
		•		Reviewed and recommended to the board the form and amount of compensation of our directors;
		•		Oversaw the administration of and compliance with the Company’s incentive and equity-based compensation plans;
		•		Reviewed the operations of the Company’s executive compensation programs to determine whether they are properly coordinated and achieving their intended purposes;
		•		Reviewed an annual compensation-risk assessment report and considered whether the Company’s incentive compensation policies and practices contain incentives for executive officers and employees to take risks in performing their duties that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company;
		•		Reviewed and discussed with management the compensation disclosures required to be included in the Company’s annual filings;
		•		Oversaw the Company’s submissions to a stockholder vote on executive compensation matters, such as our new Employee Stock Purchase Plan for employees and the advisory vote on executive compensation (“Say-on-Pay”);
		•		Reviewed the results of stockholder votes on executive compensation matters and discussed with management the appropriate engagement with stockholders in response to the votes;
		•		Reviewed the appropriateness of the Company’s peer group;
		•		Reviewed the Company’s programs and practices related to executive workforce diversity and the administration of executive compensation programs in a non-discriminatory manner; and
		•		Received and reviewed updates on regulatory and compensation trends.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

None of the members of the Compensation Committee (Suzanne Nora Johnson, Alfred F. Kelly, Jr., David J. Pang and John A. C. Swainson) is or has ever been one of our officers or employees. In addition, during the last fiscal year, none of our executive officers served as a member of the board of directors or the compensation committee of any other entity that has one or more executive officers serving on our board of directors or Compensation Committee.

Risk Assessment of Compensation Programs

The Compensation Committee annually considers potential risks when reviewing and approving our compensation programs. We have designed our compensation programs, including our incentive compensation plans, with specific features to address potential risks while rewarding employees for achieving long-term financial and strategic objectives through prudent business judgment and appropriate risk taking. The following elements have been incorporated in our compensation programs for executive officers:

Additionally, the Compensation Committee annually considers an assessment of compensation-related risks for all of our employees. Based on this assessment, the Compensation Committee concluded that our compensation programs do not create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on Visa. In making this determination, the Compensation Committee reviewed the key design elements of our compensation programs in relation to industry “best practices” as presented by Frederic W. Cook & Co. (Cook & Co.), the Compensation Committee’s independent compensation consultant, as well as the means by which any potential risks may be mitigated, such as through our internal controls and oversight by management and the board of directors. In addition, management completed an inventory of incentive programs below the executive level and reviewed the design of these incentives both internally and with Cook & Co. to conclude that such programs do not encourage excessive risk taking.

Compensation Committee Report   The Compensation Committee has:
•		reviewed and discussed the section entitledCompensation Discussion and Analysis with management; and
•		based on this review and discussion, the Compensation Committee recommended to the board of directors that theCompensation Discussion and Analysis section be included in this proxy statement.
		COMPENSATION COMMITTEE Suzanne Nora Johnson (Chair) Alfred F. Kelly, Jr. David J. Pang John A. C. Swainson

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
Committee members:   Alfred F. Kelly, Jr., Chair   Suzanne Nora Johnson   David J. Pang   John A. C. Swainson Number of meetings in fiscal year 2015: 7		Key Activities in 2015
		•		Promoted the best interests of the Company and its stockholders through the implementation of sound corporate governance principles and practices such as removing three supermajority vote provisions from our Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws following stockholder approval at the 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders;
		•		Identified, selected and appointed a new director, Lloyd A. Carney, to serve as a member of the board and the Audit and Risk Committee;
		•		Reviewed with the board the criteria used to identify individuals qualified to become our directors, including specific minimum qualifications, if any, necessary for our directors to possess;
		•		Reviewed the Corporate Governance Guidelines, Board Communication Policy and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Charter, which were approved by the board;
		•		Reaffirmed the board’s categorical standards to use in determining director independence, and reviewed the qualifications and determined the independence of the members of the board and its committees;
		•		Recommended to the board changes to the composition or size of the board from 11 to 12 with the addition of Mr. Carney;
		•		Recommended to the board changes to the board’s committee structure and committee functions, which resulted in
				(a)    William Shanahan rotating to the Audit and Risk Committee from the Compensation Committee,
				(b)    Suzanne Nora Johnson becoming Chair of the Compensation Committee, and
				(c)    Alfred Kelly becoming Chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee;
		•		Reviewed each director’s compliance with the requirements of the Corporate Governance Guidelines relating to service on other boards or audit committees of publicly-traded companies, and approved, or recommended to the board for approval, such exceptions or other actions as may be appropriate with respect to such service;
		•		Reviewed management’s continuity plan with the board, including policies and principles for the selection of the Chief Executive Officer and policies regarding succession in the event of an emergency or retirement of the Chief Executive Officer;
		•		Oversaw the board’s orientation and continuing education programs;
		•		Oversaw the annual evaluation of the board and its committees; and
		•		Readopted policies with respect to political contributions and lobbying, reviewed and approved the 2015 corporate political contribution plan, and oversaw the Company’s political contributions and lobbying activities as contemplated by such policies.

Succession Planning

Our board of directors believes that one of its primary responsibilities is to oversee the development and retention of executive talent and to ensure that an appropriate succession plan is in place for our Chief Executive Officer and other members of management. Each quarter, our Nominating and Corporate Governancethe Compensation Committee meets with our Executive Vice President, Human Resources and other executives to discuss management succession planning and to address potential vacancies in senior leadership. The Compensation Committee also annually reviews with the board succession planning for our Chief Executive Officer.

In addition to executive and management succession, the Nominating and Corporate GovernanceCompensation Committee regularly oversees and plans for director succession. In doing so, the Compensation Committee takes into consideration the overall needs, composition and size of the board, as well as the criteria adopted by the board regarding director candidate qualifications, which are described in the section entitledCorporate Governance–NominationCommittees of the Board of Directors. Individuals identified byIt is our policy that all members of the Committee as qualifiedboard should endeavor to becomeattend annual meetings of stockholders at which directors are then recommended toelected. Each of our directors serving at the full board for nomination or election.time attended the 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

24 - Visa Inc.2015 Proxy Statement

Independence of DirectorsCOMMITTEES OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

The NYSE’s listing standards and our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that a majoritycurrent standing committees of ourthe board of directors and every member ofare the Audit and Risk Committee, the Compensation Committee, and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Each of the standing committees must be “independent.” Our Certificate of Incorporation further requires that at least fifty-eight percent (58%) of our board be independent. Under the NYSE’s listing standards, our Corporate Governance Guidelines, and our Certificate of Incorporation, no director will be consideredoperates pursuant to be independent unless and until our board affirmatively determines that such director has no direct or indirect material relationship with Visa or our management. Our board reviews the independence of its members annually and has adopted guidelines to assist it in making its independence determinations. These guidelines area written charter, which is available on the Investor Relations sectionpage of our website or in print free of charge to any stockholder who requests a copy in writing from our Corporate Secretary.athttp://investor.visa.com under “Corporate Governance – Committee Composition.”

In October 2014, with the assistance of legal counsel, our board conducted its annual review of director independence and affirmatively determined that each of our non-employee directors (Mary B. Cranston, Francisco Javier Fernández-Carbajal, Alfred F. Kelly, Jr., Suzanne Nora Johnson, Robert W. Matschullat, Cathy E. Minehan, David J. Pang, William S. Shanahan, John A. C. Swainson, and Maynard G. Webb, Jr.) are “independent” as that term is defined in the NYSE’s listing standards, our independence guidelines and our Certificate of Incorporation. Prior to his retirement from our board at the January 2014 annual meeting, Gary P. Coughlan, who served as a director for a portion of the year, also was determined to be independent.

In making the determination that the directors listed above are independent, the board considered relevant transactions, relationships and arrangements, including those specified in the NYSE listing standards and our independence guidelines, and determined that these relationships were not material relationships that would impair the director’s independence. In this regard, the board considered that certain directors serve as directors of other companies with which the Company engages in ordinary-course-of-business transactions, and that, in accordance with our director independence guidelines, none of these relationships constitute material relationships that would impair the independence of these individuals. Discretionary contributions to certain charitable organizations with which some of our directors are affiliated also were considered, and the board determined that the amounts contributed to each of these charitable organizations in any fiscal year were less than the greater of $1 million or two percent of the organization’s consolidated gross revenues.

The board also considered, for Ms. Cranston (i) her daughter’s relationship with one of our employees, Russell Hamilton (who is not an executive officer), as discussed under the headingCertain Relationships and Related Person Transactions, and (ii) services provided to the Company by a law firm of which she is a retired senior partner, including that, pursuant to her retirement (which predated our engagement of the law firm), she receives no compensation from the firm, has no capital in the firm, and is no longer a signatory to the firm’s partnership agreement. For Messrs. Fernández-Carbajal, Kelly, Swainson, Webb, and Ms. Minehan, the board considered the amounts paid or received by the Company pursuant to ordinary-course-of-business transactions with other entities (which, in any single fiscal year, did not equal or exceed the greater of $1 million or two percent of the annual consolidated revenues of the other entity), where the director or the director’s immediate family member is or was an employee or officer of such entity, or had a direct or indirect ownership interest in such entity.

Audit and Risk Committee
Committee members:   Mary B Cranston, Chair   Lloyd A. Carney       Audit Committee Financial Expert   Francisco Javier Fernández-Carbajal   Cathy E. Minehan,       Audit Committee Financial Expert   William S. Shanahan       Audit Committee Financial Expert   Maynard G. Webb, Jr.   Number of meetings in fiscal year   2015:6		Key Activities in 2015
		•		Monitored the integrity of our financial statements, our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, our internal control over financial reporting and the performance of our internal audit function and KPMG, our independent registered public accounting firm;
		•		Selected, approved the compensation of and oversaw the work of KPMG;
		•		Reviewed and discussed with management the disclosures required to be included in our annual report on Form 10-K and our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, including the Company’s significant accounting policies, and areas subject to significant judgement and estimates;
		•		On a quarterly basis, reviewed audit results and findings prepared by internal audit;
		•		Reviewed and recommended to the board for approval our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers, and Audit and Risk Committee Charter, which were all approved;
		•		Monitored compliance with our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers, and reviewed the implementation and effectiveness of the Company’s compliance and ethics program;
		•		Reviewed and reapproved our Statement of Policy with Respect to Related Party Transactions, and approved related party transactions;
		•		Reviewed and discussed with management the Company’s major financial and other risk exposures and the steps taken to monitor and control those exposures, including our ERM framework and programs;
		•		Monitored the Company’s technology risks, including business continuity, information security and cybersecurity;
		•		Reviewed and approved the 2015 budget, the 2015 Business Continuity Program, the 2015 internal audit plan and the Internal Audit Charter;
		•		Identified, selected and appointed a new Chief Compliance Officer and Chief Internal Auditor; and
		•		Reviewed and reapproved the Company’s Whistleblower Policy, and established procedures for the receipt, retention and treatment of complaints we receive regarding accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters and the confidential, anonymous submission by employees of concerns regarding questionable accounting or auditing matters.

Certain Relationships and Related Person Transactions

Review, Approval or Ratification of Transactions with Related Persons

The Audit and Risk Committee of the board of directors has adopted a written Statement of Policy with Respect to Related Party Transactions, governing any transaction, arrangement or relationship between the Company and any related party where the aggregate amount involved will or may be expected to exceed $120,000 and any related party had, has or will have a direct or indirect material interest. Under the Policy, the Audit and Risk Committee or its management delegate shall review related party transactions and may approve or ratify them only if it is

determined that they are in, or not inconsistent with, the best interests of the Company and its stockholders. When reviewing a related party transaction, the Audit and Risk Committee or management delegate may take into consideration all of the relevant facts and circumstances available to it, including (if applicable), but not limited to:including: (i) the material terms and conditions of the transaction or transactions; (ii) the related party’s relationship to Visa; (iii) the related party’s interest in the transaction, including their position or relationship with, or ownership of, any entity that is a party to or has an interest in the transaction; (iv) the approximate dollar value of the transaction; (v) the availability from other sources of comparable products or services; and (vi) an assessment of whether the transaction is on terms that are comparable to the terms available to us from an

Visa Inc.2015 Proxy Statement - 25

unrelated third party. Related party transactions that are approved or ratified by the management delegate must be reported to the Audit and Risk Committee at its next regularly scheduled meeting.

In the event we become aware of a related party transaction that was not previously approved or ratified under the Policy, the Audit and Risk Committee or management delegate shall evaluate all options available, including ratification, revision or termination of the related party transaction. The Policy is intended to augment and work in conjunction with our other policies that include code of conduct and/or conflict of interest provisions, including our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers.

We engage in transactions, arrangements and relationships with many other entities, including financial institutions and professional organizations, in the ordinary course of our business. Some of our directors, executive officers, greater than five percent stockholders and their immediate family members, each a related party under the Policy, may be directors, officers, partners, employees or stockholders of these entities. We carry out transactions with these entities on customary terms, and, in many instances, our directors and executive officers may not be aware of them. To our knowledge, since the beginning of fiscal year 2014,2015, no Related Party has had a material interest in any of our business transactions or relationships other than as described below:

The Committee also has received the written disclosures and the letter from KPMG required by the applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding the independent registered public accounting firm’s communications with the audit committee concerning independence, and the Committee has discussed the independence of KPMG with that firm. The Committee also has considered whether KPMG’s provision of non-audit services to the Company impairs the auditor’s independence, and concluded that KPMG is independent from the Committee and the Company’s management. Based on the Committee’s review and discussions noted above, the Committee recommended to the board of directors that the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2015, for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Audit and Risk Committee of the Board of Directors Mary B. Cranston (Chair) Lloyd A. Carney Francisco Javier Fernández-Carbajal Cathy E. Minehan William S. Shanahan Maynard G. Webb, Jr.

Compensation Committee
Committee members:   Suzanne Nora Johnson, Chair   Alfred F. Kelly, Jr.   David J. Pang   John A. C. Swainson   Number of meetings in fiscal year   2015: 8		Key Activities in 2015
		•		Reviewed the overall executive compensation philosophy for the Company;
		•		Reviewed and approved corporate goals and objectives relevant to our Chief Executive Officer’s and other named executive officers’ compensation, including annual performance objectives;
		•		Evaluated the performance of our Chief Executive Officer and other named executive officers in light of the corporate goals and objectives and, based on such evaluation, determined, approved and reported to the board the annual compensation of our Chief Executive Officer and other named executive officers, including salary, bonus, stock options and other benefits;
		•		Reviewed and approved the compensation package or our newly hired named executive officer;
		•		Reviewed and recommended to the board the form and amount of compensation of our directors;
		•		Oversaw the administration of and compliance with the Company’s incentive and equity-based compensation plans;
		•		Reviewed the operations of the Company’s executive compensation programs to determine whether they are properly coordinated and achieving their intended purposes;
		•		Reviewed an annual compensation-risk assessment report and considered whether the Company’s incentive compensation policies and practices contain incentives for executive officers and employees to take risks in performing their duties that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company;
		•		Reviewed and discussed with management the compensation disclosures required to be included in the Company’s annual filings;
		•		Oversaw the Company’s submissions to a stockholder vote on executive compensation matters, such as our new Employee Stock Purchase Plan for employees and the advisory vote on executive compensation (“Say-on-Pay”);
		•		Reviewed the results of stockholder votes on executive compensation matters and discussed with management the appropriate engagement with stockholders in response to the votes;
		•		Reviewed the appropriateness of the Company’s peer group;
		•		Reviewed the Company’s programs and practices related to executive workforce diversity and the administration of executive compensation programs in a non-discriminatory manner; and
		•		Received and reviewed updates on regulatory and compensation trends.

Nomination of DirectorsCompensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

Nomination ProcessNone of the members of the Compensation Committee (Suzanne Nora Johnson, Alfred F. Kelly, Jr., David J. Pang and Stockholder Proposed CandidatesJohn A. C. Swainson) is or has ever been one of our officers or employees. In addition, during the last fiscal year, none of our executive officers served as a member of the board of directors or the compensation committee of any other entity that has one or more executive officers serving on our board of directors or Compensation Committee.

Risk Assessment of Compensation Programs

The NominatingCompensation Committee annually considers potential risks when reviewing and Corporate Governance Committee considersapproving our compensation programs. We have designed our compensation programs, including our incentive compensation plans, with specific features to address potential risks while rewarding employees for achieving long-term financial and recommends candidatesstrategic objectives through prudent business judgment and appropriate risk taking. The following elements have been incorporated in our compensation programs for executive officers:

Additionally, the Compensation Committee annually considers an assessment of compensation-related risks for all of our employees. Based on this assessment, the Compensation Committee concluded that our compensation programs do not create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on Visa. In making this determination, the Compensation Committee reviewed the key design elements of our compensation programs in relation to industry “best practices” as presented by Frederic W. Cook & Co. (Cook & Co.), the Compensation Committee’s independent compensation consultant, as well as the means by which any potential risks may be mitigated, such as through our internal controls and oversight by management and the board of directors. In addition, management completed an inventory of incentive programs below the executive level and reviewed the design of these incentives both internally and with Cook & Co. to conclude that such programs do not encourage excessive risk taking.

Compensation Committee Report   The Compensation Committee has:
•		reviewed and discussed the section entitledCompensation Discussion and Analysis with management; and
•		based on this review and discussion, the Compensation Committee recommended to the board of directors that theCompensation Discussion and Analysis section be included in this proxy statement.
		COMPENSATION COMMITTEE Suzanne Nora Johnson (Chair) Alfred F. Kelly, Jr. David J. Pang John A. C. Swainson

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
Committee members:   Alfred F. Kelly, Jr., Chair   Suzanne Nora Johnson   David J. Pang   John A. C. Swainson Number of meetings in fiscal year 2015: 7		Key Activities in 2015
		•		Promoted the best interests of the Company and its stockholders through the implementation of sound corporate governance principles and practices such as removing three supermajority vote provisions from our Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws following stockholder approval at the 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders;
		•		Identified, selected and appointed a new director, Lloyd A. Carney, to serve as a member of the board and the Audit and Risk Committee;
		•		Reviewed with the board the criteria used to identify individuals qualified to become our directors, including specific minimum qualifications, if any, necessary for our directors to possess;
		•		Reviewed the Corporate Governance Guidelines, Board Communication Policy and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Charter, which were approved by the board;
		•		Reaffirmed the board’s categorical standards to use in determining director independence, and reviewed the qualifications and determined the independence of the members of the board and its committees;
		•		Recommended to the board changes to the composition or size of the board from 11 to 12 with the addition of Mr. Carney;
		•		Recommended to the board changes to the board’s committee structure and committee functions, which resulted in
				(a)    William Shanahan rotating to the Audit and Risk Committee from the Compensation Committee,
				(b)    Suzanne Nora Johnson becoming Chair of the Compensation Committee, and
				(c)    Alfred Kelly becoming Chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee;
		•		Reviewed each director’s compliance with the requirements of the Corporate Governance Guidelines relating to service on other boards or audit committees of publicly-traded companies, and approved, or recommended to the board for approval, such exceptions or other actions as may be appropriate with respect to such service;
		•		Reviewed management’s continuity plan with the board, including policies and principles for the selection of the Chief Executive Officer and policies regarding succession in the event of an emergency or retirement of the Chief Executive Officer;
		•		Oversaw the board’s orientation and continuing education programs;
		•		Oversaw the annual evaluation of the board and its committees; and
		•		Readopted policies with respect to political contributions and lobbying, reviewed and approved the 2015 corporate political contribution plan, and oversaw the Company’s political contributions and lobbying activities as contemplated by such policies.

Succession Planning

Our board of directors believes that one of its charter,primary responsibilities is to oversee the development and retention of executive talent and to ensure that an appropriate succession plan is in place for our CertificateChief Executive Officer and other members of Incorporationmanagement. Each quarter, the Compensation Committee meets with our Executive Vice President, Human Resources and Bylaws,other executives to discuss management succession planning and to address potential vacancies in senior leadership. The Compensation Committee also annually reviews with the board succession planning for our Corporate Governance Guidelines,Chief Executive Officer.

In addition to executive and management succession, the Compensation Committee regularly oversees and plans for director succession. In doing so, the Compensation Committee takes into consideration the overall needs, composition and size of the board, as well as the criteria adopted by the board regarding director candidate qualifications. Candidates may come to the attention of the Committee from current directors, members of management, a professional search firm or a stockholder.

Stockholders may propose a director candidate to be considered for nomination by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee by providing the information specified in our Corporate Governance Guidelines to our Corporate Secretary within the timeframe specified for stockholder nominations of directors in our Bylaws. For additional information regarding the process for proposing director candidates to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, please see our Corporate Governance Guidelines. Stockholders who wish to nominate a person for election as a director at an annual meeting of stockholders must follow the procedurequalifications, which are described under the headingOther Information – Stockholder Nomination of Director Candidates and Other Stockholder Proposals for 2016 Annual Meeting. For additional information regarding this process, please see our Bylaws. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines and our Bylaws are available on the Investor Relations page of our website athttp://investor.visa.com under “Corporate Governance.”

Criteria for Nomination to the Board of Directors and Diversity

The Nominating and Governance Committee applies the same standards in considering director candidates submitted by stockholders as it does in evaluating other candidates, including incumbent directors. The identification and selection of qualified directors is a complex and subjective process that requires consideration of many intangible factors, and will be significantly influenced by the particular needs of the board from time to time. As a result, there is no specific set of minimum qualifications, qualities or skills that are necessary for a nominee to possess, other than those that are necessary to meet U.S. legal, regulatory and NYSE listing requirements and the provisions of our Certificate of Incorporation, Bylaws,

26 - Visa Inc.2015 Proxy Statement

Corporate Governance Guidelines, and charters of the board’s committees. When considering nominees, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee may take into consideration many factors, including a candidate’s:

In addition to the above factors, the qualification criteria adopted by the board specify that the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee should consider the value of diversity on the board when identifying and recommending director nominees. Accordingly, the Committee’s evaluation of director nominees includes consideration of their ability to contribute to the diversity of personal and professional experiences, opinions, perspectives and backgrounds on the board. Nominees are not discriminated against on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, ancestry, national origin, sexual orientation, disability or any other basis prescribed by law. The Committee will assess the effectiveness of this approach as part of the board’s annual self-evaluation process.

Under the headingProposal 1 – Election of Directors, we provide an overview of each nominee’s principal occupation, business experience and other directorships of publicly-traded companies, together with the key qualifications, attributes, skills and experience that caused the Committee and the board to determine that the nominee should serve as one of our directors.

Majority Voting Standard and Director Resignation Policy for Director Elections

Our Bylaws and Corporate Governance Guidelines provide for a majority voting standard for uncontested elections of directors. This standard states that in uncontested director elections, a director nominee will be elected only if the number of votes cast FOR the nominee exceeds the number of votes cast AGAINST the nominee. To address the “holdover” director situation under the Delaware General Corporation Law pursuant to which a director remains on the board of directors until his or her successor is elected and qualified, our Corporate Governance Guidelines require each incumbent nominee to submit an irrevocable contingent resignation letter prior to the mailing of the proxy statement for an annual meeting at which the nominee’s candidacy will be considered. If the nominee does not receive more votes cast FOR than AGAINST his or her election, our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will recommend to the board that it accept the nominee’s contingent resignation, unless it determines that acceptance of the resignation would not be in the best interests of the Company or its stockholders. The board will decide whether to accept or reject the contingent resignation at its next regularly scheduled meeting, but in no event later than 120 days following certification of the election results. The board’s decision and its reasons will be promptly disclosed in a periodic or current report filed with the SEC.

Visa Inc.2015 Proxy Statement - 27

Board of Directors and Committee Self-Evaluations

Our board of directors and each of the Nominating and Corporate Governance, Compensation and Audit and Risk committees conduct an annual self-evaluation, which includes a qualitative assessment by each director of the performance of the board and the committee or committees on which the director sits. The board also conducts an annual peer review, which is designed to assess individual director performance. The evaluations and peer review are conducted via oral interviews by a third party legal advisor selected by the board, using as the basis for discussion a list of questions that are provided to each director in advance. The results of the evaluation and any recommendations for improvement are compiled in a confidential written report, which is circulated to all directors and which is discussed with the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the board. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee oversees the evaluation process.

Codes of Conduct and Ethics

Our board of directors has adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, which applies to all directors, officers, employees and contingent staff of the Company. Additionally, the board of directors has adopted a supplemental Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers, which applies to our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, General Counsel, and other senior financial officers, whom we refer to collectively as senior officers. These Codes require the senior officers to engage in honest and ethical conduct in performing their duties, provide guidelines for the ethical handling of actual or apparent conflicts of interest between personal and professional relationships, and provide mechanisms to report unethical conduct. Our senior officers will be held accountable for their adherence to the Codes.

A copy of each of the Codes is available on the Investor Relations page of our website athttp://investor.visa.com under “Corporate Governance.” If we amend or grant any waiver from a provision of our Codes, we will publicly disclose such amendment or waiver in accordance with and if required by applicable law, including by posting such amendment or waiver on our website at the address above or by filing a current report on Form 8-K with the SEC.

Political Participation, Lobbying and Contributions Policy

In order to provide greater transparency to our stockholders regarding our political giving and to facilitate board-level oversight of our political participation, lobbying and contributions, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of our board of directors has adopted and publicly disclosed a Political Participation, Lobbying, and Contributions Policy. The Policy prohibits our directors, officers and employees from using Company resources to promote their personal political views, causes or candidates, and specifies that the Company will not directly or indirectly reimburse any personal political contributions or expenses. Directors, officers and employees also may not lobby government officials on the Company’s behalf absent the pre-approval of the Company’s Government Relations department. As such, our lobbying and political spending seek to promote the interests of the Company and its stockholders, and not the personal political preferences of our directors or executives.

Under the Policy, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee must pre-approve the use of corporate funds for political contributions, including contributions made to trade associations to support targeted political campaigns and contributions to organizations registered under Section 527 of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Internal Revenue Code”) to support political activities. The Policy also requires us to prepare and present to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee an annual report itemizing our political contributions, and to disclose this report to the public. A copy of the report is available on our website athttp://usa.visa.com/corporate-responsibility under “Operating Responsibly.”

In response to stockholder engagement, in April 2013 the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee approved amendments to the Policy to further require that the Company make reasonable efforts to obtain from U.S. trade associations whose annual membership dues exceed $25,000 the portion of such dues that are used for political contributions. This information must then be included in the annual contributions report prior to posting on our website. In addition, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee approved amendments to the Policy requiring us to prepare and present to the Committee an annual report itemizing our lobbying expenditures, which must include information regarding any memberships in and payments to tax exempt organizations that write and endorse model legislation.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will continue to review the Policy each year, to determine if further amendments are needed. To obtain a copy of the Policy, and for additional information regarding our political activities, please visit our website athttp://usa.visa.com/corporate-responsibility under “Operating Responsibility.”

28 - Visa Inc.2015 Proxy Statement

Stockholder Engagement

Our board of directors and management team value the opinions and feedback of our stockholders, and we engage with stockholders throughout the year on a variety of issues, including our executive compensation, corporate governance and corporate social responsibility practices. Stockholders and other interested parties who wish to communicate with us on these or other matters may contact our Corporate Secretary electronically atcorporatesecretary@visa.com or by mail at Visa Inc., P.O. Box 8999, San Francisco, CA 94128-8999.

Communication with the Board of Directors

Our board of directors has adopted a process by which stockholders or other interested persons may communicate with the board or any of its members. Stockholders and other interested parties may send communications in writing to any or all directors (including the Chair or the non-employee directors as a group) electronically toboard@visa.com or by mail c/o our Corporate Secretary, Visa Inc., P.O. Box 8999, San Francisco, CA 94128-8999. Communications that meet the procedural and substantive requirements of the process approved by the board of directors will be delivered to the specified member of the board of directors, non-employee directors as a group or all members of the board of directors, as applicable, on a periodic basis, which generally will be in advance of or at each regularly scheduled meeting of the board of directors. Communications of a more urgent nature will be referred to the General Counsel or the Corporate Secretary, who will determine whether it should be delivered more promptly. Additional information regarding the procedural and substantive requirements for communicating with our board of directors may be found on our website athttp://investor.visa.com, under “Corporate Governance – Contact the Board.”

All communications involving accounting, internal accounting controls, and auditing matters, possible violations of, or non-compliance with, applicable legal and regulatory requirements or the Codes, or retaliatory acts against anyone who makes such a complaint or assists in the investigation of such a complaint, may be made via email tobusinessconduct@visa.com, through our Confidential Compliance Hotline at (888) 289-9322 within the United States or the AT&T International Toll-Free Dial codes available online athttp://www.usa.att.com/traveler/access numbers/index.jsp outside of the United States, through our Confidential Online Compliance Hotline athttps://visa.alertline.com, or by mail to Visa Inc., Business Conduct Office, P.O. Box 8999, San Francisco, CA 94128-8999. All such communications will be handled in accordance with our Whistleblower Policy, a copy of which may be obtained by contacting our Corporate Secretary.

Availability of Corporate Governance Documents

To learn more about Visa’s corporate governance and to view our Corporate Governance Guidelines, Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers, and Whistleblower Policy and the charters of each of the board of directors’ committees, please visit the Investor Relations page of our website athttp://investor.visa.com under “Corporate Governance.” Copies of these documents also are available in print free of charge by writing to our Corporate Secretary at Visa Inc., P.O. Box 8999, San Francisco, CA 94128-8999.

Visa Inc.2015 Proxy Statement - 29

Attendance at Board, Committee and Annual Stockholder Meetings

Our board of directors and its committees meet throughout the year on a set schedule, hold special meetings as needed, and act by written consent from time to time. The board of directors met 11 times during fiscal year 2014. Each director attended at least 75% or more of the aggregate of: (i) the total number of meetings of the board and independent directors held during the period in fiscal year 2014 for which he or she served as a director, and (ii) the total number of meetings held by all committees of the board on which such director served during the period in fiscal year 2014 for which he or she served as a committee member. The total number of meetings held by each committee is set forth below, under the headingsection entitledCommittees of the Board of Directors.

It is our policy that all members of the board should endeavor to attend annual meetings of stockholders at which directors are elected. TenEach of our directors serving at the time attended the 2014 annual meeting2015 Annual Meeting of stockholders.Stockholders.

Executive Sessions of the Board of Directors

The non-employee, independent members of our board of directors and all committees of the board generally meet in executive session without management present during their regularly scheduled in-person board and committee meetings, and on an as-needed basis during telephonic and special meetings. Robert W. Matschullat, our independent Chair, presides over executive sessions of the board of directors and the committee chairs, each of whom is independent, preside over executive sessions of the committees.

Committees of the Board of DirectorsCOMMITTEES OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

The current standing committees of the board of directors are the Audit and Risk Committee, the Compensation Committee, and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Each of the standing committees operates pursuant to a written charter, which is available on the Investor Relations page of our website athttp://investor.visa.com under “Corporate Governance – Committee Composition.”

The following table provides a summary of our current committee structure and membership information for each committee.

Name		Audit and Risk Committee		Compensation Committee		Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
Mary B. CranstonAudit and Risk Committee						C
Committee members:   Mary B Cranston, Chair   Lloyd A. Carney       Audit Committee Financial Expert Francisco Javier Fernández-Carbajal
	Alfred F. Kelly, Jr.
	Robert W. Matschullat*		EO		EO		EO
Cathy E. Minehan,
Suzanne Nora Johnson      Audit Committee Financial Expert						C
David J. Pang
William S. Shanahan				C
John A. C. Swainson      Audit Committee Financial Expert
Maynard G. Webb, Jr.   Number of meetings in fiscal year   2015:6								Key Activities in 2015

30 - Visa Inc.2015 Proxy Statement

The following tables provide further information regarding the principal roles and responsibilities of each committee. For a more comprehensive description of committee functions, please refer to the committee charters.

Certain Relationships and Related Person Transactions

The Audit and Risk Committee has adopted a written Statement of Policy with Respect to Related Party Transactions, governing any transaction, arrangement or relationship between the Company and any related party where the aggregate amount involved will or may be expected to exceed $120,000 and any related party had, has or will have a direct or indirect material interest. Under the Policy, the Audit and Risk Committee or its management delegate shall review related party transactions and may approve or ratify them only if it is

determined that they are in, or not inconsistent with, the best interests of the Company and its stockholders. When reviewing a related party transaction, the Audit and Risk Committee or management delegate may take into consideration all of the relevant facts and circumstances available to it, including: (i) the material terms and conditions of the transaction or transactions; (ii) the related party’s relationship to Visa; (iii) the related party’s interest in the transaction, including their position or relationship with, or ownership of, any entity that is a party to or has an interest in the transaction; (iv) the approximate dollar value of the transaction; (v) the availability from other sources of comparable products or services; and (vi) an assessment of whether the transaction is on terms that are comparable to the terms available to us from an unrelated third party. Related party transactions that are approved or ratified by the management delegate must be reported to the Audit and Risk Committee at its next regularly scheduled meeting.

In the event we become aware of a related party transaction that was not previously approved or ratified under the Policy, the Audit and Risk Committee or management delegate shall evaluate all options available, including ratification, revision or termination of the related party transaction. The Policy is intended to augment and work in conjunction with our other policies that include code of conduct or conflict of interest provisions, including our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers.

We engage in transactions, arrangements and relationships with many other entities, including financial institutions and professional organizations, in the ordinary course of our business. Some of our directors, executive officers, greater than five percent stockholders and their immediate family members, each a related party under the Policy, may be directors, officers, partners, employees or stockholders of these entities. We carry out transactions with these entities on customary terms, and, in many instances, our directors and executive officers may not be aware of them. To our knowledge, since the beginning of fiscal year 2015, no Related Party has had a material interest in any of our business transactions or relationships other than as described below:

The Committee also has received the written disclosures and the letter from KPMG required by the applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding the independent registered public accounting firm’s communications with the audit committee concerning independence, and the Committee has discussed the independence of KPMG with that firm. The Committee also has considered whether KPMG’s provision of non-audit services to the Company impairs the auditor’s independence, and concluded that KPMG is independent as defined byfrom the NYSE’s listing standards, our CertificateCommittee and the Company’s management. Based on the Committee’s review and discussions noted above, the Committee recommended to the board of Incorporation, our director independence guidelines, and Rule 10A-3 underdirectors that the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2015, for filing with the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act.Commission.   Audit Committee Financial Expert: •    The board has determined that Robert W. Matschullat and Cathy E. Minehan are “audit committee financial experts” as that term is defined under the SEC’s rules. Other Audit Committee Memberships: •    No member of the Audit and Risk Committee simultaneously serves onof the audit committeesBoard of more than three public companies, including Visa Inc.Directors		Committee members: Mary B. Cranston (C)(Chair) Lloyd A. Carney Francisco Javier Fernández-Carbajal Cathy E. Minehan (F) William S. Shanahan Maynard G. Webb, Jr.

Ex Officio committee meeting attendee:  Compensation Committee Robert W. Matschullat (F)
Committee members:   Suzanne Nora Johnson, Chair   Alfred F. Kelly, Jr.   David J. Pang   John A. C. Swainson   Number of meetings in fiscal year 2014:   2015: 58   C = Chair		Key Activities in 2015   F = Audit Committee Financial Expert

Visa Inc.2015 Proxy Statement - 31

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

None of the members of the Compensation Committee (Suzanne Nora Johnson, Alfred F. Kelly, Jr., David J. Pang and John A. C. Swainson) is or has ever been one of our officers or employees. In addition, during the last fiscal year, none of our executive officers served as a member of the board of directors or the compensation committee of any other entity that has one or more executive officers serving on our board of directors or Compensation Committee.

Risk Assessment of Compensation Programs

The Compensation Committee annually considers potential risks when reviewing and approving our compensation programs. We have designed our compensation programs, including our incentive compensation plans, with specific features to address potential risks while rewarding employees for achieving long-term financial and strategic objectives through prudent business judgment and appropriate risk taking. The following elements have been incorporated in our compensation programs for executive officers:

Additionally, the Compensation Committee annually considers an assessment of compensation-related risks for all of our employees. Based on this assessment, the Compensation Committee concluded that our compensation programs do not create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on Visa. In making this determination, the Compensation Committee reviewed the key design elements of our compensation programs in relation to industry “best practices” as presented by Frederic W. Cook & Co. (Cook & Co.), the Compensation Committee’s independent compensation consultant, as well as the means by which any potential risks may be mitigated, such as through our internal controls and oversight by management and the board of directors. In addition, management completed an inventory of incentive programs below the executive level and reviewed the design of these incentives both internally and with Cook & Co. to conclude that such programs do not encourage excessive risk taking.

Independence:  Compensation Committee Report   •  The board has determined that each member of our Compensation Committee is independent as defined byhas:
•		reviewed and discussed the NYSE’s listing standards, our Certificate of Incorporation,section entitledCompensation Discussion and our director independence guidelines. Each member ofAnalysis with management; and
•		based on this review and discussion, the Compensation Committee also is independent for purposesrecommended to the board of Rule 10C-1 ofdirectors that the Exchange ActCompensation Discussion and the NYSE listing standards adopted pursuant to that rule, a “non-employee director” for purposes of Rule 16b-3 under the Exchange Act, and an “outside director” for purposes of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code.Analysis section be included in this proxy statement.
		Committee members: William S. Shanahan (C)COMPENSATION COMMITTEE Suzanne Nora Johnson (Chair) Alfred F. Kelly, Jr. Suzanne Nora Johnson David J. Pang John A. C. Swainson